Is prehospital thrombolysis beneficial to patients suffering acute MI?
Thursday, January 1, 2009
Prehospital thrombolysis (PHT) plays an important role in enabling health care trusts to achieve the call-to-needle time of 60 minutes in England and Wales, but its potential value for each patient must be weighed up by the attending paramedic, taking into account local demographics, availability of alternatives such as primary coronary angioplasty (PCA) and the restrictions of the JRCALC guidelines regarding eligibility of the patient.In light of the deteriorating effectiveness of PHT over time and its expense, in some areas money may well be better spent educating the public to call for help at an earlier stage, as well as encouraging direct admission where available to PCA by paramedics as an alternative to PHT. However, until there is an equal eligibility of patients for thrombolysis in both the prehospital and hospital settings, it is difficult for paramedics in the field to weigh up the relative effectivenes of one against the other.
Subscribe to get full access to the Journal of Paramedic Practice
Thank you for vising the Journal of Paramedic Practice and reading our archive of expert clinical content. If you would like to read more from the only journal dedicated to those working in emergency care, you can start your subscription today for just £48.
Reading the Journal of Paramedic Practice counts towards your professional development
Develop your career
We provide professional information dedicated to paramedics covering training, education and jobs
Get the latest clinical information to ensure you are aware of the latest think and best practice in paramedicne
Already registered? - Sign in here