Mechanical chest compressions and survival in the emergency setting
Paul Williams, Rob Goring, John Franklin
Tuesday, February 2, 2021
Advances in cardiac arrest management have led to the use of a mechanical chest compression device in an attempt to improve outcomes in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). This systematic review set out to identify whether the inclusion of the mechanical device improves survival rates in the cardiac arrest patient within the emergency setting, and explored the themes: training, environment and time of device deployment. The systematic review measured the value of mechanical chest compression devices versus standard manual compressions in respect to resuscitation outcomes (return of spontaneous circulation). Ten studies with data from 12 894 adult patients, who presented with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) or in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA), were included. Results demonstrated an equality between manual and mechanical CPR with a statistical increase in survival when the mechanical device is used. Training, time of deployment, guideline adherence and timing of rhythm check/defibrillation presented challenges in the analysis of the data.
Subscribe to get full access to the Journal of Paramedic Practice
Thank you for vising the Journal of Paramedic Practice and reading our archive of expert clinical content. If you would like to read more from the only journal dedicated to those working in emergency care, you can start your subscription today for just £48.
Reading the Journal of Paramedic Practice counts towards your professional development
Develop your career
We provide professional information dedicated to paramedics covering training, education and jobs
Get the latest clinical information to ensure you are aware of the latest think and best practice in paramedicne
Already registered? - Sign in here