References

Antoniucci D, Rodriguez A, Hempel A A randomised trial comparing primary infarct stenting with or without Abciximab in acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003; 42:(11)1879-85

Berg J, Hof A, Dill T Effect of early, pre-hospital initiation of high bolus dose Tirofiban in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction on short and long term clinical outcome.. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 55:2446-55

Boersma E, Harrington R, Moliterno DYork: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination; 2003

London: Department of Health; 2005

London: Department of Health; 2006

London: Department of Health; 2008a

London: Department of Health; 2008b

London: Department of Health; 2008c

London: Department of Health; 2008d

De Luca G, Suryaprantana H, Stone G Abciximab as adjunctive therapy to reperfusion in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Med Assoc. 2005; 293:(14)1759-65

Hassan A, Liem S, Kley F In-ambulance Abciximab administration in STEMI patients prior to primary PCI is associated with smaller infarct size, improved LV function and lower incidence of heart faillure: results from the Leiden MISSION! acute myocardial infarction treatment optimisation program. J Cather Cardiovasc Intervent. 2009; 74:(2)335-43

Hof A, Berg J, Heestermans T Pre-hospital initiation of Tirofiban in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary angioplasty (On-TIME 2): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008; 372:(9638)537-46

Hof A, Ernst N, Boer M Facilitation of primary coronary angioplasty by early start of a glycoprotein 2b/3a inhibitor: results of the on-going Tirofiban in myocardial infarction (On-TIME) trial. Eur Heart J. 2004; 25:(10)837-46

Jimenez J, Tricoci P Safety and efficacy of abciximab as an adjunct to percutaneous coronary intervention. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2010; 6:39-45

Johnson S, Brightwell R, Ziman M Paramedics and Pre-hospital management of acute myocardial infarction: diagnosis and reperfusion. EMJ. 2005; 23:(5)331-4

Norwich: Institute of Health and Care Development; 2006

Keeley E, Boura J, Grines C Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials. Lancet. 2003; 361:(9361)13-20

Khoury C, Dubien C, Belle L Pre-hospital high dose Tirofiban in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. The AGIR-2 study. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2010; 103:(5)285-92

Larson M, Duval S, Sharky S Clopidogrel pre-treatment in ST elevation myocardial infarction patients transferred for percutaneous coronary intervention. Am Heart J. 2010; 160:(1)202-7

Mehilli J, Kastrati A, Schulz S Abciximab in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention after Clopidogrel loading. J Am Heart Assoc. 2008; 119:1933-40

Montalescot G, Antoniucci D, Kastrati A Abciximab in primary coronary stenting of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a European meta-analysis on individual patients’ data with long term follow up. Euro Soc Cardiol. 2007; 28:(4)443-9

Montalescot G, Borentain M, Payot L Early vs. Late administration of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in primary Percutaneous coronary intervention of acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. JAMA. 2004; 292:(3)362-6

London: National Institute of Clinical Excellence; 2002

Whitbread M, Leah V, Bell T Recognition of ST elevation by Paramedics. EMJ. 2002; 19:(1)66-7

Widimsky P, Budesinsky T, Vorac D Long distance transport for primary angioplasty vs. immediate thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2002; 24:(1)94-104

Paramedic administration of glycoprotein inhibitors for ST elevation myocardial infarction

02 March 2012
Volume 4 · Issue 3

Abstract

Until recently, paramedics were routinely delivering out-of-hospital thrombolysis for ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Now that primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is the favoured reperfusion strategy, STEMI patients are by-passing the local emergency department and taken directly to the catheterisation laboratory via ambulance. STEMI patients within a rural setting are facing the prospect of extended transfer times for reperfusion of an already ischaemic myocardium, a potentially perilous strategy. Empirical research conducted outside the UK has identified that the pre-hospital administration of a glycoprotein inhibitor improves clinical outcome for STEMI patients. Glycoprotein naturally helps to build the fibrin mesh essential within the clotting process. Inhibition of this process by glycoprotein inhibitors IIb/IIIa (GPI IIb/IIIa) prevents aggregation at receptor sites on platelets. Original research supports the notion that GPI IIb/IIIa involvement improves patient clinical outcome for STEMI in the out-of-hospital phase. Paramedics are typically the first contact for the STEMI patient and it is tangible that paramedics have the appropriate skill and knowledge to diagnose the out-of-hospital STEMI. With this in mind, it is the purpose of this article to discuss the use of pre-hospital GPI IIb/IIIa administration and to argue that this intervention should be administered by paramedic personnel.

For many patients suffering from an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) within the pre-hospital setting, paramedics are the first contact within the scope of emergency healthcare. Patients suffering from an acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are cared for in the community by such healthcare workers on a frequent basis. Care pathways for these patients have evolved over the recent decade with the introduction of thrombolytic therapy; although this has now been superseded with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). PPCI is now widely accepted as the reperfusion therapy of choice when placed next to thrombolysis for STEMI (Keeley et al, 2003).

As a result of research supporting the use of PPCI, the paradigm of care is ultimately moving to one of emergency ambulance transfer to a regional intervention centre. However, ambulance crews are now transporting these patients without a reperfusion strategy or indeed an adjunct for PPCI in place. Although such a venture is clearly plausible and empirically supported, it should be recognized that many ambulance services face challenges associated to the extended transfer times of rural locations. It would be unwise to accept that all STEMI patients are stable, at low risk of deterioration, and can tolerate excessive symptom and journey times. The early indications are that pre-hospital administration of a glycoprotein inhibitor (GPI) may well be the answer to improving the clinical outcome of the STEMI patient experiencing lengthened transfer time to hospital for target vessel re-canalisation (TVR). As a result, it is the purpose of this article to discuss and consider the possibility of the paramedic based community administering a glycoprotein inhibitor IIb/IIIa for STEMI within the out-of-hospital context.

Subscribe to get full access to the Journal of Paramedic Practice

Thank you for visiting the Journal of Paramedic Practice and reading our archive of expert clinical content. If you would like to read more from the only journal dedicated to those working in emergency care, you can start your subscription today for just £48.

What's included

  • CPD Focus

  • Develop your career

  • Stay informed