References

Adams C Clinical effectiveness: a practical guide. Community Practitioner. 1999; 72:(5)125-7

Brunner J, 2nd. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1977

Carroll DC, Greenwood R, Lybch KE Barriers and facilitators to the utilisation of nursing research. Clinical Nurse Specialist. 1997; 11:(5)207-212

Case B Walking around the elephant: a critical thinking strategy for decision making. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing. 1994; 25:(3)101-9

, 2nd. Derbyshire: College of Paramedics; 2008

Craig J, Smyth RLondon: Churchill Livingston; 2002

Department of Health. 1998. http//tinyurl.com/cgukbp ((accessed 21 February 2011))

Department of Health. 2001. http//tinyurl.com/nuwx94 ((accessed 21 February 2011))

Department of Health. 2005. http//tinyurl.com/2yvj28 ((accessed 21 February 2011))

Dobrzykowski TM Teaching strategies to promote critical thinking skills in nursing staff. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing. 1994; 25:(6)272-6

Funk SG, Champagne MT, Weise RA Barriers to using research findings in practice:. The clinicians'. 1991;

Funk SG, Torniquist EM, Champagne MT Barriers and perspective. Applied Nursing Research. 1995; 4:(2)90-5

An integrative review. Nursing Clinics of North America. 30:(3)395-407

Gibbs GOxford Polytechnic: Oxford Further Education Learning Unit; 1988

London: Health Professions Council; 2009

London: Health Professions Council; 2007

Kataoka-Yahiro M, Saylor C A critical thinking model for nursing judgement. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing. 1994; 33:(8)351-6

Lenburg CB Changes that challenge nursing. Tennessee Nurse. 2002; 65:(5)10-13

Lockett TOxford: Radcliffe Medical Press; 1997

Miller ET, Edwards-Beckett J, Mikolaj E, Bower D, Pontius C Research-related needs of the Ohio nurses. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing. 1994; 25:(4)167-70

Muir Gray JANew York: Churchill Livingstone; 1997

Palmer AOxford: Blackwell; 1994

Price A Encouraging reflection and critical thinking in practice. Nursing Standard. 2004; 18:(47)46-52

Sackett DL, Strauss SE, Richardson W, 2nd. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2000

Gloucester: Quality Assurance Agency; 2004

Planning and writing an evidence-based critical reflection

02 April 2011
Volume 3 · Issue 4

Abstract

The shift of training and education of technicians and paramedics towards an academic pathway in higher education Institutes has placed greater emphasis on the need for students to demonstrate clinical effectiveness through evidence– based practice (EBP) and critical reflection in and on practice. However, the health care literature highlights that students often find it difficult to grasp the elements involved in asking questions about their practice, searching the literature and applying their findings to their critical reflections on practice. Evaluation of the learning needs of a group of nursing students reflected these findings. As a result, a guide was formulated to support student nurses in the development and application of these skills when using the Gibbs' model of reflection and this has been adapted for student paramedics. This article presents a set of guidelines which incorporate the Lenburg competency, outcomes and performance assessment (COPA) model (2002); a patient intended outcome, paramedic intervention (PIP) model, and an adapted Gibbs' reflective cycle model (Figure 1) which paramedic students can use to develop the skills required to systematically plan and write evidence based critical reflections on practice.

The continual progression and dynamic nature of health care provision, increasing consumer demands and the requirements of clinical governance in the modern NHS, have dictated the need for the adaptation of systems of care which are resource efficient and cost effective (Department of Health (DH), 1998). Furthermore, the knowledge and skills required of health care professionals have evolved and it is paramount that future practitioners are ‘fit for practice’ at the point of registration (Health Professionals Council (HPC), 2007).

These changes are reflected in the provision of prehospital care (DH, 2001) with greater responsibility being afforded to the ambulance service for mobile health provision (DH, 2005). These changes have necessitated the development of the role of the paramedic to provide evidence based emergency care (College of Paramedics (CoP), 2008).

Consequently, there has been a shift in the training and education of technicians and paramedics from the customary methods instigated by the Institute of Health Care Development, towards an academic pathway in association with higher education institutes (HEIs). This is supported by the CoP Paramedic Curriculum Guidance and Competence Framework (2008), the HPC Standards of Proficiency (2007) and Standards of Education and Training (2009), and the Quality Assurance Agency (QAA) Benchmarking Statements (2004). As a result, greater emphasis has been placed upon the need for paramedics to demonstrate clinical effectiveness through the use of critical reflection and evidence–based practice (EBP).

Subscribe to get full access to the Journal of Paramedic Practice

Thank you for visiting the Journal of Paramedic Practice and reading our archive of expert clinical content. If you would like to read more from the only journal dedicated to those working in emergency care, you can start your subscription today for just £48.

What's included

  • CPD Focus

  • Develop your career

  • Stay informed