References
PPE use when attempting prehospital resuscitation during COVID-19: conflicts between science and ethics?
Dear Editor,
Conflicting guidance continues to be issued by the Resuscitation Council (UK) (2020), Public Health England (PHE) (2020), College of Paramedics (2020) and the Association of Ambulance Chief Executives (AACE) (2020) on the level of personal protective equipment (PPE) to be used when attempting resuscitation in the prehospital settings.
As discussed in our previous article (Tang et al, 2020), the rationale to use of level 3 PPE should be based on whether the procedure(s) could generate airborne particles contaminated by known infectious substances (known as aerosols). The most up-to-date New and Emerging Respiratory Virus Threats Advisory Group (NERVTAG) (2020) consensus statement concluded that there is insufficient evidence to support chest compressions or defibrillation being procedures that are associated with a significantly increased risk of transmission of acute respiratory infections. However, it also discussed the limitation of the review ‘… evidence base is extremely weak and heavily confounded by an inability to separate out specific procedures performed as part of CPR, e.g. chest compression, defibrillation, manual ventilation and intubation…’.
Subscribe to get full access to the Journal of Paramedic Practice
Thank you for visiting the Journal of Paramedic Practice and reading our archive of expert clinical content. If you would like to read more from the only journal dedicated to those working in emergency care, you can start your subscription today for just £48.
What's included
-
CPD Focus
-
Develop your career
-
Stay informed