References

Surgical lessons learned from suicide bombing attacks. J Am Coll Surg. 2006; 202:(2)313-9

Terror in the 21st Century: milestones and prospects–Part II. Curr Probl. 2007; 44:(9)566-619

Ambulance snatching: how vulnerable are we?. J Emerg Med. 2003; 25:(2)211-4

Reduction in critical mortality in urban mass casualty incidents: analysis of triage, surge, and resource use after the London bombings on July 7, 2005. Lancet. 2006; 368:(9554)2219-25

The Hungerford multiple shooting incident 19 August 1987. Pre-hospital. 1997; 1:42-9

The Hungerford shooting incident. Injury. 1988; 19:(5)313-7

Medical response to a terrorist attack and weapons of mass destruction. Emerg Med. 2002; 14:(3)230-9

Major incidents in Britain over the past 28 years: the case for the centralised reporting of major incidents. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998; 52:(6)392-8

Successful development and implementation of a tactical emergency medical technician training program for United States federal agents. Prehosp Dis Med. 2005; 20:(1)36-9

Paramedics must be safe at major incidents. 2011. http//www.hsj.co.uk/news/workforce/paramedics-must-be-safe-at-major-incidents/5027804.article (accessed 11 July 2012)

The medical response to modern terrorism: why the ‘rules of engagement’ have changed. Ann Emerg Med. 1999; 34:(2)219-21

Magen David Adom—The EMS in Israel. Resuscitation. 2008; 76:(1)5-10

Suicide-by-cop: inviting death from the hands of a police offcer. Law and Order. 1993; 41:(7)105-8

Medical are for Terrorists—To Treat or Not to Treat?. The American Journal of Bioethics. 2009; 9:(10)40-2

Coroner's inquests into the London bombings of 7 july 2005—report under rule 43 of the coroner's rules 1984. 2011. http//7julyinquests.independent.gov.uk/docs/orders/rule43-report.pdf (accessed 2012)

London: National Emergency Training Center; 2000

, 2nd. London: BMJ Books; 2002

Major Incident Medical Training: A Systematic International Approach. International Journal of Disaster Medicine. 2003; 1:(1)13-20

Shoot to kill—understanding police use of force in combating suicide terrorism. Crime, Law and Social Change. 2007; 47:151-68

Triage decisions of united kingdom police firearms officers using a multiple-casualty scenario paper exercise. Prehosp Dis Med. 2005; 20:(1)40-6

London bombings July 2005: The immediate pre-hospital medical response. Resuscitation. 2005; 66:(2)ix-xii

MI5 warns of suicide bombers using ambulances. 2008. http//www.sundaytimes.co.uk/sto/news/uk_news/article102580.ece (accessed 12 July 2012)

Access to hospitals in the wake of terrorism: challenges and needs for maintaining public confidence. Disaster Manag Response. 2006; 4:(3)67-71

Terrorist bombings: Motives, methods and patterns of injuries. Australasian Emergency Nursing Journal. 2007; 10:(1)5-12

Recognizing imminent danger: characteristics of a suicide bomber. Emerg Med Serv. 2005; 34:(2)74-75

There is no cold zone: The hazardous materials zone model and mass terrorism chemical weapon events. Journal of Emergency Management. 2006; 4:(1)52-6

The London Attacks–Response: Prehospital and Hospital Care. New England Journal of Medicine. 2005; 353:(6)546-7

Trauma Call—Viewpoint. Care of the Critically Ill. 2005; 21:(2)

Major Incident Medical Management and Support (MIMMS): A practical, multiple casualty, disaster-site training course for all Australian health care personnel. Emergency Medicine. 2001; 13:(2)143-4

Terror medicine: birth of a discipline. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management. 2006; 3:1-6

Medical lessons from terror attacks in Israel. Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2007; 32:(1)87-92

Medical responses to terrorist incidents. Prehosp Dis Med. 1990; 5:151-3

Shooting at ambulances in Israel: a cardiologist's viewpoint. Lancet. 2003; 361:1470-1

Increased threat of suicide attack: a need for NHS ambulance services to adapt?

06 August 2012
Volume 4 · Issue 8

Abstract

Suicide attacks are an emerging threat within the UK that carry with it specific risks which must be managed in order to ensure safety and minimise injury and loss of life, both to emergency services personnel and bystanders. Major incident planning is usually based on an ‘all-hazards approach’. The aim of this article is to evaluate the current ‘all-hazards’ approach taken by NHS ambulance services for responding to a major incident and recommend if any changes need to occur as a result of the current threat from suicide attacks. In the same way that chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) was the new emerging threat a few years ago, it could be argued that suicide attacks are the new emerging threat that requires a rethink on how the ambulance service operates. Scene safety is the main issue raised in this article. Solutions ranged from the adoption of US-style tactical medicine allowing paramedics to work within the ‘hot zone’ to training police firearms officers in triage and more advanced skills of clinical care. Some of these solutions assume deployment to the scene in the first place and it is considered what level of risk is acceptable when operating in a hazardous area such as this.

Further issues identified were adaptations required to time on scene and whether to screen casualties for explosives and firearms, so as to avoid an armed terrorist being conveyed to hospital. The recommendations from this report rely heavily on cooperation between emergency responders not only during the time of a suicide attack but also during the pre-incident planning phase. Although modifications to the ambulance service response are suggested within the recommendations they do not present a radical change to how the ambulance service operates at present.

The use of suicide attacks as a terrorist tactic is a relatively new phenomenon worldwide, with a general trend of increasing frequency since the 1980s. There is no universally accepted definition of terrorism, with some commentators including within the definition only acts against non-military targets. When examining the issue of safety at major incidents and the threat of suicide attacks the author has used a broad definition of a suicide attack, and have not sought to exclude attacks against certain targets, or attacks which would not fall within some definitions of terrorism. Thus, the author has included in the definition attacks by individuals or groups of individuals, whether organised or acting alone, in which part of the intended or accepted result is the death of the perpetrator. Suicide attacks could also be combined with a chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear (CBRN) element; however, issues related to this are excluded and will not be considered in this article.

Subscribe to get full access to the Journal of Paramedic Practice

Thank you for visiting the Journal of Paramedic Practice and reading our archive of expert clinical content. If you would like to read more from the only journal dedicated to those working in emergency care, you can start your subscription today for just £48.

What's included

  • CPD Focus

  • Develop your career

  • Stay informed