References
Out-of-hospital treatment of acute myocardial infarction
Abstract
Patients who experience an acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) present a common clinical problem. While the treatment for this condition has undergone various changes in recent years, the underlying pathophysiology has remained the same. The patient experiences an acute coronary atheromatous plaque which fissures or ruptures, leading to the development of thrombus associated with the acute plaque causing occlusion of the vessel. This causes the typical symptoms of acute STEMI of chest pain, breathlessness, sweating and nausea/vomiting, as well as the classical changes on the resting electrocardiogram (ECG). Once the coronary artery is blocked, the myocardium supplied by the vessel is at risk of necrosis, unless the vessel can be reopened and the blood supply is restored. Time is of the essence, since the quicker the vessel can be reopened, the less myocardial damage occurs. In this article, the use of thrombolysis to treat patients with STEMI is described. This covers its administration within the hospital setting and its use prehospital. The treatment of patients with STEMI using coronary angioplasty/stenting is addressed, including the assessment of the patient, the procedure itself and also the care of the patient following the procedure.
Initially, thrombolysis was administered in hospital to patients presenting with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). (GISSI, 1986; ISIS—2, 1988). This treatment dissolves the thrombus and thereby restores perfusion to the ischaemic myocardium.
In order to administer this treatment as quickly as possible, targets were set to achieve optimal ‘call-to-needle’ times (the time from the patient making the call for help to the time when thrombolysis was administered) and ‘door to needle’ times (the time from when the patient arrived at the hospital to the time when thrombolysis was administered). A lot of work was carried out to ensure that the patient was transported to hospital as quickly as possible and also to ensure that a slick system was in place within the hospital for the timely administration of intravenous thrombolytic therapy. The principle that ‘time means muscle’ was established—i.e, the quicker thrombolysis was given, the more left ventricular muscle was saved (GISSI, 1986; ISIS—2, 1988).
Subscribe to get full access to the Journal of Paramedic Practice
Thank you for visiting the Journal of Paramedic Practice and reading our archive of expert clinical content. If you would like to read more from the only journal dedicated to those working in emergency care, you can start your subscription today for just £48.
What's included
-
CPD Focus
-
Develop your career
-
Stay informed