References

Department of Health. 2006. http//tinyurl.com/2v9kd5k (accessed 22 August 2011)

London: Department of Health; 2007

Donabedian A The defnition of quality: a conceptual exploration. In: Donabedian A, Arbor A Michigan: Health Administration Press; 1980

Gelling L Ethical principles in healthcare research. Nursing Standard. 1999; 13:(36)39-42

Guly HOxford: Oxford University Press; 1996

Harrison A Consent and common law. Nursing Times. 1997; 93:(52)52-4

Hawton K, Weatherall R, Zahl D Suicide following deliberate self harm: long-term follow-up of patients who presented to a general hospital. Br J Psychiatry. 2003; 182:537-42

Horrocks J, House A Self-poisoning and self injury in adults. Clinical Medicine, Journal of the Royal College of Physicians. 2002; 2.6:509-12

St Ives: Institute of Alcohol Studies; 2007

Institute of Psychiatry. Threshold assessment grid. 2011. http//tinyurl.com/3mtzvxm (accessed 22 August 2011)

Joint Royal Colleges Ambulance Liaison Committee. 2006. http//tinyurl.com/3t4wvxz (accessed 3 August 2011)

Lugon M, Scally G Clinical Governance: Effective Strategy. Clinical Governance Bulletin. 2001; 2:(1)

2007. http//www.addictioninfo.org (accessed 3 August 2011)

London: NICE; 2004

Offce for National Statistics. 2011. http//tinyurl.com/42r2p3u (accessed 22 August 2011)

London: Department of Health; 2001

Patel AS, Harrison A, Bruce-Jones W Evaluation of the risk assessment matrix: a mental health triage tool. EMJ. 2009; 26:11-14

Phillips C ‘What is cost-effectiveness?’. Evidence Based Medicine. 2006; 1:(3)1-6

Scally G, Donaldson LJ Clinical Governance and the drive for quality improvement in the new NHS in England. BMJ. 1998; 317:61-5

Snooks HA, Dale J, Hartley-Sharpe C On-scene alternatives for ambulance crews attending patients who do not need to travel to the accident and emergency department: a review of the literature. EMJ. 2004; 21:212-5

Singleton N, Bumpstead R, O'Brien MLondon: Stationery Offce; 2001

Somerset Partnership. 2006. http//tinyurl.com/3pxxuel (accessed 22 August 2011)

Thompson I, Melia KM, Boyd KM, 5th ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2006

Wrigley H, George S, Smith H Trends in demand for emergency ambulance services in Wiltshire over nine years: observational study. BMJ. 2002; 324:646-7

Improving the assessment and referral of mental health patients

02 September 2011
Volume 3 · Issue 9

Abstract

This article discusses a report which sought to examine how patients with mental health (MH) problems were treated by South West Ambulance Service Trust (SWAST); particularly in cases of threatened suicide and/or deliberate self harm, the strongest predictor of suicide (Hawton et al, 2003), and compared the findings with the national picture. SWAST had similar organizational difficulties in that MH service providers’ boundaries do not match theirs, so a pan-trust policy is hard to achieve. There are some local arrangements in existence, although this report sought to pursue uniformity in approach rather than reinforcing the notion of the ‘postcode lottery’ of healthcare delivery.

Ambulance clinicians are attempting to avoid inappropriate admissions to accident and emergency (A&E) departments in line with the Bradley Report (Department of Health (DH), 2005), but are hampered by the lack of effective 24-hour mental health (MH) cover and referral pathways to places of safety, although improvements are expected. Increased strategic collaboration between MH care providers and ambulance trusts will liberate opportunities to capitalize on any improvements as joint stakeholders.

The Suicide Risk Assessment score currently listed within ambulance guidelines (JRCALC, 2006) is a fairly blunt tool, with poor staff confidence and use, typically resulting in the patient attending A&E. On review, the research panel proposed the adoption of an evidence-based assessment form for ambulance clinicians to use when assessing and referring MH patients.

Scally and Donaldson (1998) advocate clinical governance to improve care and quality within the NHS. In line with this, this article will use the review, agree, implement and demonstrate (RAID) (Cullen et al, 2000) quality framework for this assignment (Figure 1). It has been specifically designed as a tool for clinical governance and is easy to use and understand. The process is split into four sections and encourages constant re-evaluation in the pursuit of excellence by its cyclic design.

Subscribe to get full access to the Journal of Paramedic Practice

Thank you for visiting the Journal of Paramedic Practice and reading our archive of expert clinical content. If you would like to read more from the only journal dedicated to those working in emergency care, you can start your subscription today for just £48.

What's included

  • CPD Focus

  • Develop your career

  • Stay informed