References

Connor D, Greaves I, Porter K, Bloch M. Pre-hospital spinal immobilisation: an initial consensus statement. Emerg Med J. 2013; 30:(12)1067-1069 https://doi.org/https//.org/10.1136/emermed-2013-203207

Brown JB, Rosengart MR, Forsythe RM Not all prehospital time is equal: influence of on scene time on mortality. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016; 81:(1)93-100 https://doi.org/https//.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000000999

Dias AR, Abib Sde C, Poli-de-Figueiredo LF, Perfeito JA. Entrapped victims in motor vehicle collisions: characteristics and prehospital care in the city of Sao Paulo, Brazil. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2011; 66:(1)21-25

Dixon M, O'Halloran J, Hannigan A, Keenan S, Cummins NM. Confirmation of suboptimal protocols in spinal immobilisation?. Emerg Med J. 2015; 32:(12)939-945 https://doi.org/https//.org/10.1136/emermed-2014-204553

Kleber C, Giesecke MT, Tsokos M, Haas NP, Buschmann CT. Trauma-related preventable deaths in Berlin 2010: need to change prehospital management strategies and trauma management education. World J Surg. 2013; 37:(5)1154-1161 https://doi.org/https//.org/10.1007/s00268-013-1964-2

National Audit Office. Major trauma care in England. 2010. https//tinyurl.com/ycqtusqx (accessed 14 March 2018)

Nutbeam T, Fenwick R, Hobson C, Holland V, Palmer M. The stages of extrication: A prospective study. Emerg Med J. 2014; 31:(12)1006-1008 https://doi.org/https//.org/10.1136/emermed-2013-202668

Nutbeam T, Fenwick R, Hobson C, Holland V, Palmer M. Extrication time prediction tool. Emerg Med J. 2015; 32:(5)401-403 https://doi.org/https//.org/10.1136/emermed-2013-202864

Wilmink AB, Samra GS, Watson LM, Wilson AW. Vehicle entrapment rescue and pre-hospital trauma care. Injury. 1996; 27:(1)21-25

Medical vs. true physical traffic collision entrapment

02 April 2018
Volume 10 · Issue 4

Abstract

Motor vehicle collisions (MVCs) are the leading cause of major trauma in the UK. The extrication phase following an MVC represents an important and largely unstudied part of the patient journey from injury to definitive care. Current methods result in significant patient delays and potential for patient deterioration. This article reports on the incidence of medical vs. true physical entrapment following MVCs in a UK population. The low incidence of true physical entrapment (12%) gives significant potential for clinicians to adapt extrication plans to optimise care for each patient.

Motor vehicle collisions (MVCs) are the most common cause of major trauma in the UK (National Audit Office, 2010). Extrication of trapped patients following an MVC is reported to be required for 12% of patients (Wilmink et al, 1996), although international studies have found this number to be as high as 33% (Dias et al, 2011). The extrication period represents a key element of a patient's journey from the point of injury to arrival at a facility that can provide definitive care (Figure 1). For pre-hospital clinicians, their response time (from their location to the incident) and the total transport time (from the incident to the hospital) are essentially fixed time periods which cannot be changed for that patient, on that day, with the transport resources available at that time. Therefore, the total on-scene time represents the only truly variable element, of which the extrication plan and method make up a considerable percentage. The extrication plan and method can be adapted to meet the needs of individual patients, through multi-agency teamwork and appreciation of the priorities of care.

Subscribe to get full access to the Journal of Paramedic Practice

Thank you for visiting the Journal of Paramedic Practice and reading our archive of expert clinical content. If you would like to read more from the only journal dedicated to those working in emergency care, you can start your subscription today for just £48.

What's included

  • CPD Focus

  • Develop your career

  • Stay informed