References

Aprahamian C, Thompson BM, Gruchow HW Decision making in pre-hospital sudden cardiac arrest.. Ann Emerg Med. 1986; 15:(4)445-9

Barnett M, Fisher J, Cooke H Breaking bad news: Consultants’ experience, previous education and views on educational format and timing. MedEduc. 2007; 41:(10)947-56

Douglas L, Ratnapalan S, Cheskes S Death notification in the field: A pilot survey study. Can Paramedicine. 2011; 34:(5)27-9

Halpern J, Gurevich M, Schwartz B Interventions for critical incident stress in emergency medical services: A qualitative study.2009

Halpern J, Gurevich M, Schwartz B, Brazeau P What makes an incident critical for ambulance workers? Emotional outcomes and implications for intervention. Work Stress. 2009; 23:(2)173-89

Holzhauser K, Finucane J Part B: A survey of staff attitudes immediately post-resuscitation tofamily presence during resuscitation. Australas Emerg Nursing J. 2008; 11:(3)114-2

Iserson KV Grave Words.Tucson: Galen Press; 1999

Joint Royal Colleges Ambulance Liaison Committee. UK Ambulance Service Clinical Practice Guidelines. 2006. http//www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/med/research/hsri/emergencycare/pre-hospitalcare/jrcalcstakeholderwebsite/guidelines (accessed 22 August 2012)

McGahey-Oakland PR, Lieder HS, Young A Family experiences during resuscitation at a children’shospital emergency department. JPaediatr Health Care. 2007; 21:(4)217-25

Morrison LJ, Kierzek G, Diekema DS Part 3: Ethics: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2010; 122:(suppl 3)S665-S675

Nolan JP, Soar J, Zideman DA European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation2010 Section 1.Executive Summary. Resuscitation. 2010; 81:(10)1219-76

Norton RL, Bartkus EA, Schmidt TA Survey of emergency medical technicians’ ability to cope with deaths of patients during pre-hospital care. Prehosp Disaster Med. 1992; 7:(3)235-42

Parahoo KHampshire: Palgrave Macmillan; 2006

Paramedic Association of Canada. paramedic. 2011. http//ca/nocp/nocp_communication (accessed 22 August 2012)

Regehr C, Goldberg G, Glancy GD Posttraumatic symptoms and disability in paramedics. Can J Psychiatry,. 2002; 47:(10)953-8

Roth R, Sewart RD, Rogers K Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: Factors associated with survival. Ann Emerg Med. 1984; 13:(4)237-43

Schensul JJ, Lecompte MD, Natasi BKLondon: ActamiraPress; 1999

Schmidt TA, Tolle SW Emergency physicians’ responses to familiesfollowing patient death. Ann Emerg Med. 1990; 19:(2)125-8

Smith TL, Walz B, Smith R A death education curriculum for emergency physicians, paramedics, and other emergency providers. Pre-hospital Emerg Care. 1999; 3:(1)37-41

Smith-Cumberland T, Feldman RH EMTs’ attitudes toward death before and after a death education program. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2006; 10:(1)89-95

Steen E, Naess AC, Steen PA Paramedics’ organizational culture and their care for relatives of cardiac arrest survivors. Resuscitation. 1997; 34:(1)57-63

Timmermans SPhiladelphia: Temple University Press; 1999

Paramedics' experiences with death notification: a qualitative study

09 September 2012
Volume 4 · Issue 9

Abstract

Objective

To explore paramedics’ experiences and coping strategies with death notification in the field.

Methods

Urban and urban/rural paramedics participated in four focus groups across Ontario, Canada.They were asked about their experiences communicating death notifications and the support they received. Transcripts were analysed using the constant comparative method. Themes were generated inductively.

Results

Twenty-eight paramedics participated. Four themes emerged: the practical aspects of deathnotification, how paramedics acknowledge the emotional toll, how they manage the emotional toll, and the support mechanisms they used. Communicating a death notification is stressful and paramedics’ personal attitudes to death influence how they communicate a notification. Switching roles from clinician to supporter is challenging. Deaths that are unexpected, traumatic, obvious, involve children, with which the paramedic identifies, or are the paramedic’s first experience are especiallystressful. Paramedics receive support by talking to peers and using informal support networks. They prefer support from people who have had similar experiences.

Conclusion

Paramedics’ experiences with death notification are stressful, challenging, andrewarding. More formal support for paramedics is necessary, especially when the nature of the death is distressing. Our study suggests that further training is required to increase paramedics’ comfort with this challenging communication.

Every year,30000 cardiac arrests occur outside the hospital in the UK (Nolan et al, 2010). Paramedics are required to pronounce patients in the field in 53–61 % of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (Roth et al, 1984; Aprahamian et al, 1986). As such, paramedics are frequently required to communicate death notifications to the bereaved in a pre-hospital setting (Norton et al, 1992; Regehr et al, 2002;Smith-Cumberland and Feldman, 2006). In a pilot study, paramedics perceived death notification to be even more challenging when communicating notifications for deaths that were traumatic, unexpected, preventable, involved children, within a situation they identified with, or when it was their first experience (Douglas et al, 2011). Paramedics may be the only source of support for survivors after a death occurs in the field and balancing patient care with delivering calm, compassionate support can be challenging (Schmidt and Tolle, 1990; Smith et al, 1999).

Subscribe to get full access to the Journal of Paramedic Practice

Thank you for visiting the Journal of Paramedic Practice and reading our archive of expert clinical content. If you would like to read more from the only journal dedicated to those working in emergency care, you can start your subscription today for just £48.

What's included

  • CPD Focus

  • Develop your career

  • Stay informed