References

Bath PMW, Dixon M, Appleton J Rapid Intervention With Glyceryl Trinitrate In Hypertensive Stroke Trial-2 (Right-2): Safety And Efficacy Of Transdermal Glyceryl Trinitrate, A Nitric Oxide Donor. Emerg Med J. 2016; 33:e13-e14

Benger JR, Kirby K, Black S Effect of a Strategy of a Supraglottic Airway Device vs Tracheal Intubation During Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest on Functional Outcome: The AIRWAYS-2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2018; 320:(8)779-791 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.11597

Bengtsson M How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open. 2016; 2:8-14 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001

Bigham BL, Jensen JL, Blanchard IE Paramedic-driven research. CMAJ. 2010; 182:(10) https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.110-2079

Brett J, Staniszewska S, Mockford C Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: A systematic review’. Health Expect. 2014; 17:(5)637-650 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00795.x

Burns E Developing email interview practices in qualitative research. Sociol Res Online. 2010; 15:(4)1-12 https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.2232

The research audit trail—enhancing trustworthiness in qualitative inquiry. 2009. https//tinyurl.com/y9ucp9gm (accessed 15 November 2018)

Clancy K Experiences of a novice researcher. Nurse Res. 2007; 14:(4)27-38

Clarke V, Braun V Successful qualitative research: a practical guide for beginners.London: Sage; 2014

Cottrell E, Whitlock E, Kato E Defining the benefits of stakeholder engagement in systematic reviews. Comp Eff Res. 2015; 5:13-19 https://doi.org/10.2147/CER.S69605

Creswell J Research design.Thousand Oaks CA: Sage; 2014

Deverka PA, Lavallee DC, Desai PJ Stakeholder participation in comparative effectiveness research: defining a framework for effective engagement. J Comp Eff Res. 2012; 1:(2)181-94 https://doi.org/10.2217/cer.12.7

Erbay H Some ethical issues in prehospital emergency medicine. Turk J Emerg Med. 2016; 14:(4)193-8 https://doi.org/10.5505/1304.7361.2014.32656

Esmail L, Moore E, Rein A Evaluating patient and stakeholder engagement in research: moving from theory to practice. J Comp Eff Res. 2015; 4:(2)133-45 https://doi.org/10.2217/cer.14.79

Fischer CT Bracketing in qualitative research: conceptual and practical matters. Psychother Res. 2009; 19:(4–5)583-90 https://doi.org/10.1080/10503300902798375

Forsythe L, Heckert A, Margolis MK, Schrandt S, Frank L Methods and impact of engagement in research, from theory to practice and back again: early findings from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Qual Life Res. 2018; 27:(1)17-31 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1581-x

Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013; 13 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-117

Goodman MS, Sanders Thompson VL The science of stakeholder engagement in research: classification, implementation, and evaluation. Transl Behav Med. 2017; 7:(3)486-91 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-017-0495-z

Griffiths P, Mooney G The Paramedics Guide to Research.Berkshire: Open University Press; 2012

Paramedic Handbook.London: HCPC; 2007

Paramedics: Standards of Proficiency Paramedics.London: HCPC; 2014

Jones C, Jones P Paramedic research methods: importance and implications. J Paramedic Pract. 2009; 1:(11)465-9 https://doi.org/10.12968/jpar.2009.1.11.43741

Kaiser K Protecting respondent confidentiality in qualitative research. Qual Health Res. 2009; 19:(11)1632-41 https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732309350879

Kapoor K, Wu BU, Banks PA The value of formal clinical research training in initiating a career as a clinical investigator. Gastroenterol Hepatol (NY). 2011; 7:(12)810-3

Keown K, Van Eerd D, Irvin E Stakeholder engagement opportunities in systematic reviews: knowledge transfer for policy and practice. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2008; 28:(2)67-72 https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.159

King N, Horrocks C Interviews in Qualitative Research.Thousand Oaks CA: SAGE; 2010

Molyneux S, Bull S Consent and community engagement in diverse research contexts. Participants in the community engagement and consent workshop, Kilifi, Kenya, March 2011. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2013; 8:(4)1-18 https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2013.8.4.1

Morton SM, Bandara DK, Robinson EM, Carr PE In the 21st century, what is an acceptable response rate?. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2012; 36:(2)106-8 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-6405.2012.00854.x

Why research matters for ambulance services. 2016. https//www.dc.nihr.ac.uk/blog/why-research-matters-for-ambulance-services/3539 (accessed 15 November 2018)

National Institute for Health Research. Patient and public involvement in health and social care research: A handbook for researchers. 2014. https//tinyurl.com/ybnkvlpg

NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement. The Handbook of Quality and Service Improvement Tools. 2010. http//tinyurl.com/ydesoxrh (accessed 15 November 2018)

O'Haire C, McPheeters M, Nakamoto E Engaging Stakeholders To Identify and Prioritize Future Research Needs [Internet].Rockville MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2011

O'Meara P, Maguire B, Jennings P, Simpson P Building an Australasian paramedicine research agenda: a narrative review. Health Res Policy Syst. 2015; 13 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-015-0065-0

Palinkas LA, Horwitz SM, Green CA Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research. Administration and policy in mental health. NIH Public Access. 2015; 42:(5)533-44 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y

Pandi-Perumal SR, Akhter S, Zizi F Project stakeholder management in the clinical research environment: how to do it right. Front Psychiatry. 2015; 6 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00071

Perkins GD, Jacobs IG, Nadkarni VM Cardiac Arrest and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Outcome Reports: Update of the Utstein Resuscitation Registry Templates for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From a Task Force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (American Heart Association, European Resuscitation Council, Australian and New Zealand Council on Resuscitation, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, InterAmerican Heart Foundation, Resuscitation Council of Southern Africa, Resuscitation Council of Asia); and the American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee and the Council on Cardiopulmonary, Critical Care, Perioperative and Resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2015; 96:328-40 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.11.002

Perkins GD, Ji C, Deakin CD A Randomized Trial of Epinephrine in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. N Engl J Med. 2018; 379:(8)711-721 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1806842

Renedo A, Marston CA, Spyridonidis D, Barlow J Patient and public involvement in healthcare quality improvement: how organizations can help patients and professionals to collaborate. Public Manage Rev. 2015; 17:(1)17-34 https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.881535

Rhodes J, Bergstrom B, Lok P, Cheng V A framework for stakeholder engagement and sustainable development in MNCs. J Global Responsib. 2014; 5:(1)82-103 https://doi.org/10.1108/JGR-02-2014-0004

Roller MR, Lavrakas PJ Applied qualitative research design: a total quality framework approach.New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2015

Sappleton N, Lourenço F Email subject lines and response rates to invitations to participate in a web survey and a face-to-face interview: the sound of silence. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2016; 19:(5)611-22 https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2015.1078596

Schiller C, Winters M, Hanson HM, Ashe MC A framework for stakeholder identification in concept mapping and health research: a novel process and its application to older adult mobility and the built environment. BMC Public Health. 2013; 13 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-428

Snooks HA, Anthony R, Chatters R Support and Assessment for Fall Emergency Referrals (SAFER) 2: a cluster randomised trial and systematic review of clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of new protocols for emergency ambulance paramedics to assess older people following a fall with referral to community-based care when appropriate. Health Technol Assess. 2017; 21:(13)1-218 https://doi.org/10.3310/hta21130

Stakeholder analysis. 2014. http//tinyurl.com/hrqv9yx (accessed 15 November 2018)

Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32–item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007; 19:(6)349-57 https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042

Wood M, Welch C Are ‘qualitative’ and ‘quantitative’ useful terms for describing research?. Method Innov. 2010; 5:(1)56-71 https://doi.org/10.4256/mio.2010.0010

Examining the benefits of paramedic engagement for the novice researcher

02 December 2018
Volume 10 · Issue 12

Abstract

Background:

Paramedics new to research need to know how to optimise the quality of proposed research studies. A prehospital mixed-methods study design required guidance, not only from an academic perspective but also from experts within paramedicine. Paramedic engagement was defined as an exercise where paramedic researchers and paramedic clinical academics could be involved as advisory professionals.

Aim:

The aim of this paramedic engagement was the revision of a proposed research design on how senior clinical advisers determine futility in pulseless electrical activity in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Method:

Five research paramedics and four clinical academics were interviewed by email using semi-structured questions. A generic qualitative inquiry with inductive content analysis was applied.

Results:

Paramedic engagement identified five themes: rewording the proposed study title; acknowledging that paramedics withdrew resuscitation; the implications of prolonged futile resuscitation; the need for autonomous paramedic decision-making; and improving research methodology.

Conclusions:

Professional paramedic engagement meant a number of complexities were identified within prehospital research and and pragmatic solutions were provided to the limitations in the proposed design. Novice researchers within paramedicine would benefit from early paramedic engagement to facilitate the design of research studies, provide guidance on methodology and identify limitations to improve the overall quality of prehospital research proposals.

Paramedic-driven research is fast becoming a core component of professional development, guided by the Health and Care Professions Council (HCPC) (Griffiths and Mooney, 2011). The HCPC suggests that paramedic registrants should not only recognise the value of research but also engage in evidence-based practice, be aware of research methodologies and evaluate research to inform clinical practice (HCPC, 2007). Paramedics have increasingly become more involved in prehospital research, which has led to changes in clinical and operational guidelines (Bigham et al, 2010).

Despite this progress, Griffiths and Mooney (2011) suggest that paramedic-led research in the UK is limited. However, the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) (Munro, 2016) said that the NHS cannot fail to notice the evolution of ambulance service-led research. Ambulance trusts, often in partnership with universities, have developed landmark studies, including the PARAMEDIC2 (Perkins et al, 2018) trial, SAFER2 trial (Snooks et al, 2017), RIGHT2 (Bath et al, 2016) and AIRWAYS2 (Benger et al, 2018), not only recruiting large numbers of participants but also engaging thousands of paramedics.

Subscribe to get full access to the Journal of Paramedic Practice

Thank you for visiting the Journal of Paramedic Practice and reading our archive of expert clinical content. If you would like to read more from the only journal dedicated to those working in emergency care, you can start your subscription today for just £48.

What's included

  • CPD Focus

  • Develop your career

  • Stay informed