References

Agarwal G, Lee J, McLeod B Social factors in frequent callers: a description of isolation, poverty and quality of life in those calling emergency medical services frequently. BMC Public Health. 2019; 19:(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6964-1

Alruwaili A, Alanazy A, Alanazi TM Managing high frequency of ambulance calls in hospitals: a systematic review. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2024; 17:287-296 https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S436265

Alving BE, Christensen JB, Thrysøe L Hospital nurses' information retrieval behaviours in relation to evidence based nursing: a literature review. Health Info Libr J. 2018; 35:(1)3-23 https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12204

Aslam RW, Snooks H, Porter A STRategies to manage Emergency ambulance Telephone Callers with sustained High needs: an Evaluation using linked Data (STRETCHED) – a study protocol. BMJ Open. 2022; 12:(3) https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053123

Blackwood R, Wolstenholme A, Kimergård A Assertive outreach treatment versus care as usual for the treatment of high-need, high-cost alcohol related frequent attenders: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2020; 20:(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8437-y

Budhwani N, Capanna MV, Baban A Care planning or case management for frequent emergency department attendance in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022; 2022:(6) https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD014662

Clarke GM, Conti S, Wolters AT, Steventon A Evaluating the impact of healthcare interventions using routine data. BMJ. 2019; 365 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l2239

Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. CASP checklist: for qualitative research. 2025b. https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/qualitative-studies-checklist/ (accessed 13 March 2025)

Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. CASP checklist: for cohort studies. 2025a. https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/cohort-study-checklist/ (accessed 13 March 2025)

Edwards MJ, Bassett G, Sinden L, Fothergill RT Frequent callers to the ambulance service: patient profiling and impact of case management on patient utilisation of the ambulance service. Emerg Med J. 2015; 32:(5)392-396 https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2013-203496

Elston J, Gradinger FP, Streeter AJ, Macey S, Martin S Effectiveness of a targeted telephone-based case management service on activity in an emergency department in the UK: a pragmatic difference-in-differences evaluation. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022; 22:(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08415-2

Evans BA, Khanom A, Edwards A Experiences and views of people who frequently call emergency ambulance services: a qualitative study of UK service users. Health Expect. 2024; 27:(1) https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13856

Frequent Caller National Network. Frequent Caller National Network (FreCaNN) – Written evidence (AES0008). 2022. https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/113035/pdf/ (accessed 13 March 2025)

Gabet M, Armoon B, Meng X, Fleury MJ Effectiveness of emergency department based interventions for frequent users with mental health issues: a systematic review. Am J Emerg Med. 2023; 74:1-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2023.09.008

Grazioli VS, Moullin JC, Kasztura M Implementing a case management intervention for frequent users of the emergency department (I-CaM): an effectiveness-implementation hybrid trial study protocol. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019; 19:(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3852-9

Harring AKV, Graesli O, Häikiö K, Hjortdahl M, Jørgensen TM Frequent contacts to emergency medical services (EMS): more than frequent callers. BMC Emerg Med. 2024; 24:(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-024-01104-9

Hudon C, Chouinard MC, Lambert M, Dufour I, Krieg C Effectiveness of case management interventions for frequent users of healthcare services: a scoping review. BMJ Open. 2016; 6:(9) https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012353

Hudon C, Chouinard MC, Lambert M, Diadiou F, Bouliane D, Beaudin J Key factors of case management interventions for frequent users of healthcare services: a thematic analysis review. BMJ Open. 2017; 7:(10) https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017762

Hudon C, Chouinard MC, Bisson M Case management programs for improving integrated care for frequent users of healthcare services: an implementation analysis. Int J Integr Care. 2022; 22:(1) https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5652

Kumar GS, Klein R Effectiveness of case management strategies in reducing emergency department visits in frequent user patient populations: a systematic review. J Emerg Med. 2013; 44:(3)717-729 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.08.035

Kwame A, Petrucka PM A literature-based study of patient-centered care and communication in nurse-patient interactions: barriers, facilitators, and the way forward. BMC Nurs. 2021; 20:(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00684-2

Mak CCM, Mao DRH, Siddiqui FJ A new paradigm in management of frequent attenders to emergency departments with severe alcohol use disorder – a pilot study for assertive community treatment in Singapore. Front Health Serv. 2022; 2 https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2022.1029455

McDonnell AJ, McLaughlin R, O'Neill R, Wolfe J, Sinclair N, Ruddell N A mass distribution letter as an early intervention for potential frequent callers. J Paramed Pract. 2022; 14:(11)449-454 https://doi.org/10.12968/jpar.2022.14.11.449

Memedovich A, Asante B, Khan M A mapping review of interventions to address patients who frequently seek care in the emergency department. BMC Emerg Med. 2024; 24:(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-024-00970-7

Middleton A, Gunn J, Bassilios B, Pirkis J Systematic review of research into frequent callers to crisis helplines. J Telemed Telecare. 2014; 20:(2)89-98 https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X14524156

Moe J, Kirkland SW, Rawe E Effectiveness of interventions to decrease emergency department visits by adult frequent users: a systematic review. Acad Emerg Med. 2017; 24:(1)40-52 https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.13060

Moseley L, Scott J, Fidler G ‘If it was easy somebody would have fixed it’: an exploration of loneliness and social isolation amongst people who frequently call ambulance services. Health Expect. 2024; 27:(4) https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.14167

Noble H, Smith J Reviewing the literature: choosing a review design. Evid Based Nurs. 2018; 21:(2)39-41 https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2018-102895

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Int J Surg. 2021; 88 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906

Schultes M An introduction to implementation evaluation of school-based interventions. Eur J Dev Psychol. 2023; 20:(1)189-201 https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2021.1976633

Scott J, Strickland AP, Warner K, Dawson P Describing and predicting frequent callers to an ambulance service: analysis of 1 year call data. Emerg Med J. 2014a; 31:(5)408-414 https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2012-202146

Scott J, Strickland AP, Warner K, Dawson P Frequent callers to and users of emergency medical systems: a systematic review. Emerg Med J. 2014b; 31:(8)684-691 https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2013-202545

Scott J, Pakpahan E, Marlow B, Daxner N Defining a threshold above which an adult can be considered to frequently use ambulance services: a retrospective cross-sectional study of emergency calls to an ambulance service in England. Br Paramed J. 2023; 7:(4)35-45 https://doi.org/10.29045/14784726.2023.3.7.4.35

Sillero-Rejon C, Kirbyshire M, Thorpe R Supporting High-impAct useRs in Emergency Departments (SHarED) quality improvement: a mixed-method evaluation. BMJ Open Qual. 2023; 12:(4) https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002496

Skogevall S, Kaminsky E, Håkansson J, Holmström IK One for all or all for one? An integrative review of research on frequent callers. PEC Innov. 2022; 1 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100070

Skogevall S, Blomberg H, Kaminsky E Optimizing healthcare for frequent callers to an emergency medical dispatch center – a mixed method intervention. 2024; https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4966586

Smith DP, McNally A Delivering enhanced safety, productivity and experience: early results from a frequent caller management system. J Paramed Pract. 2014; 6:(12)634-641 https://doi.org/10.12968/jpar.2014.6.12.634

Smith MA, Moyer D Frequent user system engagement: a quality improvement project to examine outcomes of a partnership to improve the health of emergency department frequent users. J Nurs Care Qual. 2021; 36:(4)376-381 https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000534

Snooks HA, Khanom A, Cole R What are emergency ambulance services doing to meet the needs of people who call frequently? A national survey of current practice in the United Kingdom. BMC Emerg Med. 2019; 19:(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-019-0297-3

Snowdon K Frequent callers and frustrated clinicians. J Paramed Pract. 2022; 14:(7)1-7 https://doi.org/10.12968/jpar.2022.14.7.CPD1

Soril LJ, Leggett LE, Lorenzetti DL, Noseworthy TW, Clement FM Reducing frequent visits to the emergency department: a systematic review of interventions. PLoS One. 2015; 10:(4) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123660

Stangl AL, Earnshaw VA, Logie CH The Health Stigma and Discrimination Framework: a global, crosscutting framework to inform research, intervention development, and policy on health-related stigmas. BMC Med. 2019; 17:(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1271-3

Stergiopoulos V, Gozdzik A, Tan de Bibiana J Brief case management versus usual care for frequent users of emergency departments: the Coordinated Access to Care from Hospital Emergency Departments (CATCH-ED) randomized controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016; 16:(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1666-1

Stergiopoulos V, Gozdzik A, Cohen A The effect of brief case management on emergency department use of frequent users in mental health: Findings of a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2017; 12:(8) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182157

Tangherlini N, Villar J, Brown J The HOME team: evaluating the effect of an EMS-based outreach team to decrease the frequency of 911 use among high utilizers of EMS. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016; 31:(6)603-607 https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X16000790

Willis LD The peer review process. Respir Care. 2024; 69:(4)492-499 https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.11838

Zayed MG, Williams V, Glendenning AC Care-pathways for patients presenting to emergency ambulance services with self-harm: national survey. Emerg Med J. 2020; 37:(12)752-755 https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2019-208967

Reducing frequent caller use of ambulance services: a review of effective strategies

02 April 2025
Volume 17 · Issue 4

Abstract

Background:

Frequent callers are known to place significant stress on ambulance services through decreased system efficiency and increased costs. Frequent callers often have interconnected and complex physical, mental and social needs, which bring them into contact with ambulance services.

Aims:

This review synthesised evidence on strategies to mitigate frequent caller impact on ambulance services while meeting callers' individual needs.

Methods:

Major databases were systematically searched for relevant studies and critically appraised. Main themes were analysed and reported on.

Findings:

Preliminary evidence indicates that mass-distribution letters, case-management and caller-management systems may reduce frequent caller impact. Ambulance services require clear definitions and identification systems; information should be shared between services and multi-component strategies explored. Understanding the reasons behind calls can enable more personalised, effective care.

Conclusion:

Initial evidence points to promising frequent caller reduction strategies but further high quality research is urgently needed to confirm their effectiveness and support implementation.

In recent years, the increased demand for ambulance services has drawn attention to the phenomenon of frequent callers who, although making up a small subset of service users, account for a disproportionately high volume of calls (Scott et al, 2014a; 2023; Aslam et al, 2022).

Frequent callers often request ambulance services for non-emergency reasons, resulting in increased costs, reduced availability of ambulances for other people and, therefore, a lower quality of care for those needing emergency care (Snooks et al, 2019). The consequences of frequent callers highlight the importance of effective strategies that can be introduced to reduce such calls.

The definition of frequent callers to ambulance services has previously varied across the evidence base (Smith and McNally, 2014; Edwards et al, 2015). Variability in definitions can significantly impact research findings and real-world applications (Middleton et al, 2014; Scott et al, 2023). Therefore, the Frequent Caller National Network (FreCaNN), established in 2013, defined a frequent caller as one who generates five or more calls in 1 month or 12 calls in a 3-month period (FreCaNN, 2022). Although this definition has been criticised for limiting the definition to those who call themselves and omitting other calls (Harring et al, 2024), the FreCaNN definition aims to provide consistency to help healthcare services share best practice and inform local and national policy on the standardised management of frequent ambulance callers.

Subscribe to get full access to the Journal of Paramedic Practice

Thank you for visiting the Journal of Paramedic Practice and reading our archive of expert clinical content. If you would like to read more from the only journal dedicated to those working in emergency care, you can start your subscription today for just £48.

What's included

  • CPD Focus

  • Develop your career

  • Stay informed