References

How non-invasive ventilation helps patients in respiratory failure. JEMS. 2008; 33:(2)78-83

Joint Royal Colleges Ambulance Lwwiaison Committee. 2009. http//jrcalc.org.uk/newjrcalcguidance/oxygen_guideline_combined220409.pdf (accessed 20 October 2011)

Guideline for emergency oxygen use in adult patients. Thorax. 2008; 63:vi1-vi68

Bi-level home ventilators for non-invasive positive pressure ventilation. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 2004; 61:(4)213-21

Edinburgh: Scottish Ambulance Service Internal Communication; 2011

Effects of nasal pressure support on ventilation and inspiratory work in normocapnic and hypercapnic patients with stable COPD. Chest. 2002; 122:(1)75-83

Pre-hospital improvised bronchodilator therapy of a patient on bi-level positive airway pressure therapy

06 April 2012
Volume 4 · Issue 4

Abstract

Patients suffering acute breathlessness is a common emergency situation, many patients with airways disease require bronchodilator therapy with (3-agonists. To assist the management of these cases paramedics use guidelines drawn up by the Joint Royal Colleges Ambulance Liaison Committee (JRCALC). They provide guidance on the management of most situations paramedics are likely to encounter. However, there will be occasions when paramedics are called to deal with a situation which is outside of their experience and the JRCALC guidelines do not provide the appropriate guidance required to fully inform clinical decision making. In the UK telephone support from a physician skilled in the specific discipline they require is generally not available, so paramedics have become skilled at improvising. This case study describes such an improvisation, in the management of acute breathlessness in a patient who is on home bi-level positive airway pressure (BiPAP) therapy.

On the 15th of June 2011 the Medical Director of the Scottish Ambulance Service approved the use of a T-piece in-line nebulizer device (Figure 1) for use by paramedics and emergency medical technicians (Scottish Ambulance Service, 2011). This internal communication indicated that instruction on its use would follow during mandatory updates and after such training, staff would then be deemed competent and authorised to use this device. Shortly after this directive, a call to attend a forty-year-old male having breathing diffculties was received by the Emergency Medical Dispatch Centre (EMDC) and was subsequently attended by the authors. Both authors had not yet attended the mandatory update referred to above and consequently did not carry the T-piece in-line nebulizer device.

On arrival it was found that the patient had a patent airway supported by a non-invasive ventilation (NIV) device via nasal mask, was breathing at a rate of 30 breaths per minute, had a heart rate of 160 beats per minute with full, regular radial pulses and was alert’ on the AVPU scale (AVPU: Alert, responds to Verbal stimulus, responds to Pain, Unresponsive).

Subscribe to get full access to the Journal of Paramedic Practice

Thank you for visiting the Journal of Paramedic Practice and reading our archive of expert clinical content. If you would like to read more from the only journal dedicated to those working in emergency care, you can start your subscription today for just £48.

What's included

  • CPD Focus

  • Develop your career

  • Stay informed