References
Prehospital amputation: a scoping review
Abstract
Background:
Where limbs or extremities become entrapped and it is not possible to extricate a patient in time to prevent death, or because of a deterioration or scene safety emergency, prehospital amputation is an option to enable extrication.
Aims:
This study aimed to analyse accounts of prehospital amputation and identify factors that may influence practice as well as areas for further research.
Methods:
A search of multiple databases (AMED, BNI, CINAHL, EMCARE, Google Scholar and PubMed) and additional literature for accounts of prehospital amputation was carried out.
Results:
Thirteen sources of evidence describing 20 cases of prehospital amputation (18) or dismemberment (2) in a variety of settings between 1975 and 2019 were identified. Prehospital amputation was reported following structural collapse (8), industrial accidents (6), road traffic crashes (5) and rail incidents (1). The procedure was undertaken for a range of reasons, including unsuccessful traditional extrication attempts (7), time-critical patient condition (6), a risk of further extrication attempts causing structural destabilisation (5) and dismemberment of deceased victims (2). The equipment used to perform the amputation was not reported in 14 cases. Outcomes were reported in 17 accounts, with all patients surviving to hospital.
Conclusion:
Prehospital amputation is performed extremely rarely and accounts in the literature are limited. The situations and environments in which prehospital amputation is reported vary and specialist teams are often required. Further review of guidance and studies on techniques may be beneficial.
Cases of severe or complex entrapment pose significant challenges for prehospital clinicians for several reasons. First, the nature of complex entrapments may mean access to provide lifesaving interventions is limited. Second, extrication techniques may create further hazards to both rescuers and patients, such as destabilisation of surrounding structures. These cases are often associated with road traffic crashes (RTC), but may also result from incidents involving industrial machinery and following structural collapses.
Entrapment can be categorised as physical, in which a patient cannot be removed without intervention to create space, or medical, in which factors such as suspected injuries prevent immediate extrication (Fenwick and Nutbeam, 2018). The rate of physical patient entrapment following an RTC is low. A study of all RTCs in the West Midlands requiring fire and rescue service (FRS) attendance for extrication between October 2010 and March 2012 found the rate of physical entrapment to be 12% (36/296) (Fenwick and Nutbeam, 2018). Nonetheless, the length of the prehospital phase of care has been demonstrated to be a significant factor in mortality following trauma (Brown et al, 2016) and entrapment has been observed to be a contributory factor in extending this time period (Dias et al, 2011; Nutbeam et al, 2014).
Subscribe to get full access to the Journal of Paramedic Practice
Thank you for visiting the Journal of Paramedic Practice and reading our archive of expert clinical content. If you would like to read more from the only journal dedicated to those working in emergency care, you can start your subscription today for just £48.
What's included
-
CPD Focus
-
Develop your career
-
Stay informed