References

Antman C, Lau J, Kupelnick B, Mosteller F, Chalmers I A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials and recommendations of clinical experts. JAMA. 1992; 268:(2)240-8 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1992.03490020088036

Boardman S, Richmond C, Robson W, Daniels R Prehospital management of a patient with severe sepsis. Journal of Paramedic Practice. 2009; 1:(5)183-8 https://doi.org/10.12968/jpar.2009.1.5.42060

Boyd J, Forbes J, Nakada T, Walley KR, Russell JA Fluid resuscitation in septic shock: A positive fluid balance and elevated central venous pressure are associated with increased mortality. Crit Care Med. 2011; 39:(2)254-65 https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181feeb15

Burney M, Underwood J, McEvoy S Early detection and treatment of severe sepsis in the emergency department: Identifying barriers to implementation of a protocol-based approach. J Emerg Nurs. 2012; 38:(6)512-17 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2011.08.011

Cannon C, Holthaus C, Zubrow M The GENESIS Project (GENeralized Early Sepsis Intervention Strategies): A Multicenter Quality Improvement Collaborative. J Intensive Care Med. 2013; 28:(6)355-68 https://doi.org/10.1177/0885066612453025

Cronshaw H, Daniels R, Bleetman A, Joynes E, Shiels M Impact of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign on the recognition and management of severe sepsis in the emergency department: are we failing?. Emerg Med J. 2011; 1-6 https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.2009.089581

Daniels R, Nutbeam T, McNamara G, Glavin C The sepsis six and the severe sepsis resuscitation bundle: a prospective observational cohort study. Emerg Med J. 2011; 28:(6)507-12 https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.2010.095067

Dellinger P, Levy M, Carlet J Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Crit Care Med. 2008; 36:(1)296-327 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-007-0934-2

Francis M, Rich T, Williamson T, Peterson D Effect of an emergency department sepsis protocol on time to antibiotics in severe sepsis. CJEM. 2010; 12:(4)303-10 https://doi.org/10.1017/S1481803500012380

Gray A, Ward K, Lees F, Dewar C, Dickie S, McGuffie C The epidemiology of adults with severe sepsis and septic shock in Scottish emergency departments. Emerg Med J. 2013; 30:(5)397-401 https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2012-201361

Guerra W, Mayfield T, Meyers M, Clouatre A, Riccio J Early detection and treatment of patients with severe sepsis by pre-hospital personnel. J Emerg Med. 2013; 44:(6)1116-25 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.11.003

Harrison D, Welch C, Eddlestone J The epidemiology of severe sepsis in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, 1996 to 2004: a secondary analysis of a high quality database, the INARC Case Mix Programme Database. Crit Care. 2006; 10:(2) https://doi.org/10.1186/cc4854

Jones A, Shapiro N, Trzeciak S, Arnoll R, Claremot H, Kline J Lactate clearance vs central venous oxygen saturation as goals of early sepsis therapy. JAMA. 2010; 303:(8)739-46 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.158

Kumar A, Roberts D, Wood K Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2006; 34:(6)1589-96 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CCM.0000217961.75225.E9

Langley M, Langley C Adult sepsis in a pre-hospital environment. Journal of Paramedic Practice. 2012; 4:(5)260-5 https://doi.org/10.12968/jpar.2012.4.5.260

Levy M, Kink M, Marshall J 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference. Crit Care Med. 2003; 31:(4)1250-6 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CCM.0000050454.01978.3B

Levy M, Dellinger P, Townsend S The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: Results of an international guideline-based performance improvement program targeting severe sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2010; 38:(2)1-8 https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181cb0cdc

, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell; 2005

McClelland G, Younger P A study into pre-alerts to North East hospitals for sepsis. Journal of Paramedic Practice. 2013; 5:(7)408-15 https://doi.org/10.12968/jpar.2013.5.7.408

Middleton S, Barnett J, Reeves D What is an integrated care pathway?.Newmarket: Hayward Medical Communications; 2001

Newton M, Tunn E, Moses I, Ratcliffe D, Mackway-Jones K Clinical navigation for beginners: the clinical utility and safety of paramedic pathfinder. Emerg Med J. 2013; 31:(e1)29-34 https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2012-202033

Nguyen H, Smith S Sepsis in the 21st century: recent definitions and therapeutic advances. Am J Emerg Med. 2007; 25:(5)564-71 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2006.08.015

NHS England. 2014. http//bit.ly/10PYi8G (accessed 20 September 2014)

Plambech M, Lurie A, Ipsen H Initial successful implementation of sepsis guidelines in an emergency department. Dan Med J. 2012; 59:(12)

Robson W, Nutbeam T, Daniels R Sepsis: a need for prehospital intervention?. Emerg Med J. 2009; 26:(7)535-8 https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.2008.064469

Seymour C, Band R, Cooke C Out-of-hospital characteristics and care of patients with severe sepsis: a cohort study. J Crit Care. 2010; 25:(4)553-62 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2010.02.010

Seymour C, Cooke C, Heckbert S Prehospital intravenous access and fluid resuscitation in severe sepsis: an observational cohort study. Crit Care. 2014; 18:(5) https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-014-0533-x

Seymour C, Rea T, Kahn J, Walkey A, Yealy D, Angus D Severe sepsis in pre-hospital emergency care: analysis of incidence, care and outcome. Am J Resp Care Med. 2012; 186:(12)1264-71 https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201204-0713OC

Slade E, Tamber P, Vincent J The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: raising awareness to reduce mortality. Crit Care. 2003; 7:(1)1-2 https://doi.org/10.1186/cc1876

Studnek J, Artho M, Garner C, Jones A The impact of emergency medical services on the ED care of severe sepsis. Am J Emerg Med. 2012; 30:(1)51-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2010.09.015

Talan D, Moran T, Abrahamian F Severe sepsis and septic shock in the emergency department. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2008; 22:(1)1-31 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idc.2007.09.005

Vanzant A, Schmelzer M Detecting and treating sepsis in the emergency department. J Emerg Nurs. 2011; 37:(1)47-54 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2010.06.020

Walshe K, Smith JMaidenhead: Open University Press; 2006

A clinical review of the indications for, and subsequent implementation of, a pilot pre-hospital sepsis pathway within NWAS

02 October 2015
Volume 7 · Issue 10

Abstract

Aim:

Review the clinical evidence for, and introduce a modified ‘Red Flag’ sepsis screening tool, treatment pathway and associated education package into a pilot site within the North West Ambulance Service NHS Trust (NWAS) and evaluate its impact.

Methods:

Retrospective application of a modified ‘Red Flag’ sepsis screening tool to 259 hospital confirmed cases of sepsis to evaluate the current identification and treatment of sepsis within NWAS. A subsequent prospective pilot launch of the tool within central Manchester in collaboration with Salford Royal Foundation Trust and Central Manchester Foundation Trust hospital emergency departments, collecting and analysing 100 cases of suspected sepsis in which the screening tool has been utilised.

Results:

The modified ‘Red Flag’ sepsis tool was found to be highly sensitive when applied retrospectively. Only 46% of confirmed severe sepsis cases were found to show hypotension (systolic BP <90 mmHg) pre-hospital. In the pilot, complete analysis of Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) criteria and a suspicion and documentation of sepsis increased from 15% to 94%. Compliance with a bundle of care in suspected severe sepsis cases increased from 10% to 90%.

Conclusions:

The introduction of a modified ‘Red Flag’ screening tool significantly improved pre-hospital sepsis identification and treatment within the pilot site. Paramedics were able to give fluid boluses to normotensive patients in suspected severe sepsis safely without adverse incident.

The Government is overwhelmingly the most influential body shaping health care in the United Kingdom (UK) (Walshe and Smith, 2006). Evidencing this, NHS England (2014) released a Sepsis Stage 2 Patient Safety Alert requiring each ambulance service to have in development a screening tool, treatment pathway and educational programme for sepsis. At the time of this release, no active sepsis pathway was being utilised within the North West Ambulance Service NHS Trust (NWAS).

Sepsis is defined as:

‘an overwhelming uncontrolled, systemic inflammatory response which is mediated by the immune system, the vascular endothelium and inflammatory pathways in response to an infective trigger’

There are 100 000 cases of sepsis each year in the UK, with 36 800 deaths attributed to sepsis (Harrison et al, 2006). Despite internationally agreed sepsis definitions (Box 1) and the introduction of the ‘Sepsis Six’ bundle of care (Box 2) as part of the ‘Surviving Sepsis Campaign’ (Dellinger et al, 2008), sepsis remains responsible for 27% of all intensive care unit beds in England and Wales (Robson et al, 2009).

Subscribe to get full access to the Journal of Paramedic Practice

Thank you for visiting the Journal of Paramedic Practice and reading our archive of expert clinical content. If you would like to read more from the only journal dedicated to those working in emergency care, you can start your subscription today for just £48.

What's included

  • CPD Focus

  • Develop your career

  • Stay informed