References

Bridgwater: Class Professional Publishing; 2013

Bektas F, Eken C, Karadeniz O, Goksu E, Cubuk M, Cete Y Intravenous Paracetamol or morphine for the treatment of renal colic: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2009; 54:(4)568-74 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.06.501

Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. 2014. http//www.casp-uk.net/#!casp-tools-checklists/c18f8

Craig M, Jeavons R, Probert J, Benger J Randomised comparison of intravenous morphine for acute traumatic limb pain in the emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2012; 29:(1)37-9 https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.2010.104687

Eken C, Serinken M, Elicabuk H, Uyanik E, Erdal M Intravenous paracetamol versus dexketoprofen versus morphine in acute mechanical low back pain in the emergency department: a randomised double-blind controlled trial. Emerg Med J. 2014; 31:(3)177-81 https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2012-201670

International Association for the Study of Pain. 2012. http//www.iasp-pain.org/Education/Content.aspx?ItemNumber=1698&navItemNumber=576#Hyperalgesia (accessed 21 December 2015)

Iqbal M, Spaight PA, Siriwardena AN Patients' and emergency clinicians' perceptions of improving pre-hospital pain management: a qualitative study. Emerg Med J. 2012; 30:(3) https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2012-201111

Jadad ALondon: BMJ Books; 1998

Lord B, Cui J, Woollard M Ambulance call triage outcomes for patients reporting pain: a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of pain score versus triage level. Emerg Med J. 2009; 26:(2)123-7 https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.2008.058719

Parahoo K, 2nd edn. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan; 2006

Pearson A, Field J, Jordan ZOxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2007

Polit D, Beck C, 6th edn. London: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2006

Porth C, Matfin G, 8th edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2011

Rehmani R A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of paracetamol versus morphine for the treatment of acute painful crisis of sickle cell disease. Ann Emerg Med. 2010; 56:(3)19-20 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.06.088

Serinken M, Eken C, Turkcuer I, Elicabuk H, Uyanik E, Schultz CH Intravenous paracetamol versus morphine for renal colic in the emergency department: a randomised double-blind controlled trial. Emerg Med J. 2012; 29:(11)902-5 https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2011-200165

Todd KH, Funk KG, Funk JP, Bonacci Clinical significance of reported changes in pain severity. Ann Emerg Med. 1996; 27:(4)485-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-0644(96)70238-X

Waller D, Renwick A, Hiller K, 3rd edn. Toronto: Saunders Elsevier; 2010

Is IV paracetamol as effective an analgesic as IV morphine for patients in non-cardiac pain? A literature review

02 January 2016
Volume 8 · Issue 1

Abstract

Since the introduction of IV paracetamol to UK ambulance services in 2012 there has been some debate as to which is the better analgesic, IV paracetamol or IV morphine. This literature review was designed to compare the effectiveness of IV paracetamol and IV morphine and consider whether IV paracetamol has any morphine sparing effects. A clinical question was constructed asking: ‘Is IV paracetamol as effective an analgesic as IV morphine for patients in non-cardiac pain?’ and inputted into a variety of journal databases. This returned 2 952 articles, of which 60 abstracts were read and 9 were reviewed, after relevant exclusions were made. It was found that IV paracetamol is as effective as IV morphine and consistently causes fewer adverse reactions, if given as a stand-alone medication. The review suggests that IV paracetamol could significantly reduce the dose of IV morphine required for post-operative patients. The review recommends that paramedics should favour administering IV paracetamol rather than IV morphine, if the clinician is faced with a choice. Current guidelines need to be updated in line with current research that demonstrates the effectiveness and safety of IV paracetamol.

In 2012, intravenous (IV) paracetamol was introduced to the range of analgesics available to paramedics. The Association of Ambulance Chief Executives (AACE) stated that IV paracetamol is effective at reducing opioid requirements and can be used for patients in severe pain as part of a balanced pain regime (AACE, 2013: 337). The AACE also state that IV paracetamol should be considered in the presence of musculoskeletal pain or when morphine is contraindicated (AACE, 2013: 8). IV paracetamol also has a greater safety profile, with side effects such as hypotension being extremely rare, whereas morphine has a far greater range of side effects including respiratory depression, nausea and vomiting (AACE, 2013). These side effects could cause detriment to the patient experience and must be taken into account when deciding on a pain regime. Therefore, adverse reactions and their incidences of occurrence have been included within this review.

Subscribe to get full access to the Journal of Paramedic Practice

Thank you for visiting the Journal of Paramedic Practice and reading our archive of expert clinical content. If you would like to read more from the only journal dedicated to those working in emergency care, you can start your subscription today for just £48.

What's included

  • CPD Focus

  • Develop your career

  • Stay informed